par Campone, Mario;Beck, Joseph Thaddeus;Gnant, Michael;Neven, Patrick;Pritchard, Kathleen;Bachelot, Thomas;Provencher, Louise;Rugo, Hope;Piccart-Gebhart, Martine ;Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.;Nunzi, Martina;Heng, Daniel Y C;Baselga, José;Komorowski, Anna;Noguchi, Shinzaburo;Horiguchi, Jun;Bennett, Lee;Ziemiecki, Ryan;Zhang, Jie;Cahana, Ayelet;Taran, Tetiana;Sahmoud, Tarek;Burris, Howard H.A.
Référence Current medical research and opinion, 29, 11, page (1463-1473)
Publication Publié, 2013-11
Référence Current medical research and opinion, 29, 11, page (1463-1473)
Publication Publié, 2013-11
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : | Objective: Everolimus (EVE)+exemestane (EXE; n = 485) more than doubled median progression-free survival versus placebo (PBO) + EXE (n = 239), with a manageable safety profile and no deterioration in health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) who recurred or progressed on/after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy. To further evaluate EVE + EXE impact on disease burden, we conducted additional post-hoc analyses of patient-reported HRQOL. Research design and methods: HRQOL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter until treatment discontinuation because of disease progression, toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Endpoints included the QLQ-C30 Global Health Status (QL2) scale, the QLQ-BR23 breast symptom (BRBS), and arm symptom (BRAS) scales. Between-group differences in change from baseline were assessed using linear mixed models with selected covariates. Sensitivity analysis using pattern-mixture models determined the effect of study discontinuation on/before week 24. Treatment arms were compared using differences of least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) at each timepoint and overall. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00863655. Main outcome measures: Progression-free survival, survival, response rate, safety, and HRQOL. Results: Linear mixed models (primary model) demonstrated no statistically significant overall difference between EVE + EXE and PBO + EXE for QL2 (LSM difference = -1.91; 95% CI = -4.61, 0.78), BRBS (LSM difference = -0.18; 95% CI = -1.98, 1.62), or BRAS (LSM difference = -0.42; 95% CI = -2.94, 2.10). Based on pattern-mixture models, patients who dropped out early had worse QL2 decline on both treatments. In the expanded pattern-mixture model, EVE + EXE-treated patients who did not drop out early had stable BRBS and BRAS relative to PBO + EXE. Key limitations: HRQOL data were not collected after disease progression. Conclusions: These analyses confirm that EVE + EXE provides clinical benefit without adversely impacting HRQOL in patients with HR+ ABC who recurred/progressed on prior NSAIs versus endocrine therapy alone. © 2013 Informa UK Ltd. |