par Roumeguere, Thierry 
;Bollens, Renaud ;Quackels, Thierry ;Vanden Bossche, Marc ;Zlotta, Alexandre ;Schulman, Claude
Référence Revue médicale de Bruxelles, 24, 5, page (400-407)
Publication Publié, 2003-10
;Bollens, Renaud ;Quackels, Thierry ;Vanden Bossche, Marc ;Zlotta, Alexandre ;Schulman, Claude Référence Revue médicale de Bruxelles, 24, 5, page (400-407)
Publication Publié, 2003-10
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Since the past 10 years, results have established laparoscopy's efficacy. It is actually a consistent surgical option for a lot of indications met in urology. The rational behind performing laparoscopic procedures includes shorter hospital stays, less postoperative pain and a more rapid return to usual activity. Drawbacks of laparoscopy include significant learning curve, longer operative times and higher overall costs. One particular focus is the oncologic applications of laparoscopy for nephrectomy and specially for radical prostatectomy. Laparoscopy become nowadays an usual part of the armamenturium of urological teams. |
