par Archambeau, Kim;Forstmann, Birte;Van Maanen, Leendert;Gevers, Wim 
Référence Psychonomic bulletin & review, 27, 1, page (130-138)
Publication Publié, 2020-02
Référence Psychonomic bulletin & review, 27, 1, page (130-138)
Publication Publié, 2020-02
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Proactive interference occurs when previously learned information interrupts the storage or retrieval of new information. Congruent with previous reports, traditional analyses dealing with response times and error rates separately have indicated an increase in sensitivity to proactive interference in older adults. We reanalyzed the same data using diffusion decision model (DDM). Such models enable a more fine-grained interpretation concerning the latent processing mechanisms underlying performance. Now a different picture emerged. The DDM results showed that older adults needed more evidence than young adults before responding. The results also clearly indicated that peripheral processes (encoding time and motor execution), as well as recognition memory, decline with age. However, the drift rates, reflecting proactive interference, were similar, suggesting—contrary to earlier reports—that the inhibitory processes observed with this paradigm remain intact in older adults. |
