par Kenis, Cindy;Decoster, Lore;Flamaing, Johan;Debruyne, Philip P.R.;De Groof, I.;Focan, Christian;Cornélis, Frank;Verschaeve, Vincent;Bachmann, Christian;Bron, Dominique 
;Luce, Sylvie ;Debugne, G.;Van den Bulck, H;Goeminne, Jean Charles;Schrijvers, Dirk;Geboers, K.;Petit, Bernard ;Langenaeken, Christine;Van Rijswijk, Ruud;Specenier, Pol M;Jerusalem, Guy;Praet, Jean-Philippe ;Vandenborre, Katia ;Lobelle, Jean Pierre;Lycke, Michelle;Milisen, Koen;Wildiers, Hans
Référence Annals of oncology, 29, 9, page (1987-1994)
Publication Publié, 2018-09
;Luce, Sylvie ;Debugne, G.;Van den Bulck, H;Goeminne, Jean Charles;Schrijvers, Dirk;Geboers, K.;Petit, Bernard ;Langenaeken, Christine;Van Rijswijk, Ruud;Specenier, Pol M;Jerusalem, Guy;Praet, Jean-Philippe ;Vandenborre, Katia ;Lobelle, Jean Pierre;Lycke, Michelle;Milisen, Koen;Wildiers, HansRéférence Annals of oncology, 29, 9, page (1987-1994)
Publication Publié, 2018-09
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | In the general older population, geriatric assessment (GA)-guided treatment plans can improve overall survival, quality of life and functional status (FS). In GA-related research in geriatric oncology, studies mainly focused on geriatric screening and GA but not on geriatric recommendations, interventions and follow-up. The aim of this study was to investigate the adherence to geriatric recommendations and subsequent actions undertaken in older patients with cancer. |
