par Moossdorff, Martine;van Roozendaal, Lori LM;Strobbe, Luc LJ;Aebi, Stefan;Cameron, David A;Dixon, J Michael;Giuliano, Armando AE;Haffty, Bruce BG;Hickey, Brigid BE;Hudis, Clifford;Klimberg, Suzanne VS;Koczwara, Bogda;Kühn, Thorsten;Lippman, Marc ME;Lucci, Anthony;Piccart-Gebhart, Martine 
;Smith, Benjamin D;Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C G;van de Velde, Cornelis Jh;Van Zee, Kimberly KJ;Vermorken, Jan B;Viale, Giuseppe;Voogd, Adri AC;Wapnir, Irene L;White, Julia R;Smidt, Marjolein ML
Référence Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 106, 12
Publication Publié, 2014-12
;Smith, Benjamin D;Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C G;van de Velde, Cornelis Jh;Van Zee, Kimberly KJ;Vermorken, Jan B;Viale, Giuseppe;Voogd, Adri AC;Wapnir, Irene L;White, Julia R;Smidt, Marjolein MLRéférence Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 106, 12
Publication Publié, 2014-12
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | In breast cancer studies, many different endpoints are used. Definitions are often not provided or vary between studies. For instance, "local recurrence" may include different components in similar studies. This limits transparency and comparability of results. This project aimed to reach consensus on the definitions of local event, second primary breast cancer, regional and distant event for breast cancer studies. |
