• Citer

A feasibility study of high dose rate brachytherapy in solitary urinary bladder cancer

par Soete, Guy;Coen, Véronique L M A V.;Storme, Guy ;Keuppens, Francis;De Boe, Veerle;Verellen, Dirk
Référence International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 38, 4, page (743-747)
Publication Publié, 1997-07

Article révisé par les pairs

• Accès en ligne
• Détails
• Contenu
• Statistiques

Résumé :

Purpose: To determine the feasibility of high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of T1-T3 solitary bladder cancer and to compare results and side-effects to those obtained by others using conventional, i.e., low dose rate regimens. Methods and Materials: Between July 1992 and 1995, 16 patients entered the study. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range: 45-79 years). Diagnostic transurethral resection showed four T1, five T2, and seven T3 lesions, all proven solitary by random biopsies. Radiotherapy consisted of low-dose preoperative external beam irradiation (3 x 3.5 Gy on the 3 consecutive days prior to implantation), followed by high dose rate brachytherapy (15 x 3 Gy during the 8 consecutive days thereafter). Median follow-up from the date of implantation was 23 months (range: 6-43 months). In 15 patients, cystoscopy was systematically performed during follow-up, whereas the 16th patient was followed on a clinical basis only. Results: Recurrences have occurred in 2 of 15 evaluable patients (both stage T3): metastasis in 1 and combined local plus distant failure in the other patient. Cystoscopic evaluation showed persisting alterations of the implanted portion of the bladder mucosa in 11 of 15 evaluable patients (ulceration, calcifications, and/or punctiform bleedings). Symptomatic radiation cystiris was mild and transient in 14 but persisting and severe in 2 patients. Conclusion: This study documents the feasibility of high dose rate brachytherapy in a selected group of bladder cancer patients. Both patient outcome and side-effects are comparable to the best results obtained with low dose rate schedules. Additional follow-up is still needed to enforce the comparison.