• Citer

Examen clinique de l'enfant infirme moteur cérébral: existe-t-il un consensus entre les praticiens?

par Bonnechere, Bruno ;Wermenbol, Vanessa ;Dan, Bernard ;Degelaen, Marc;Salvia, Patrick ;Rooze, Marcel ;Van Sint Jan, Serge
Référence Revue médicale de Bruxelles, 34, 2, page (70-78)
Publication Publié, 2013

Article révisé par les pairs

• Détails
• Contenu

Résumé :

Diagnosis and most of all classification of children with cerebral palsy (CP) remain a challenge for clinicians. To help them in this process, clinicians can rely on several clinical testing procedures as well as complementary investigations. The goal of this study was to determine which clinical tests found in the literature are the most frequently used in common practice in Belgium. Forty tests have been found in the literature. They have been sorted into five different categories: quantitative evaluation of motor function, spasticity evaluation, orthopaedic testing, upper limb evaluation and complementary investigations. Seven clinicians (five medical doctors and two physiotherapists) with a mean experience of sixteen years with CP children answered the questionnaire. Concerning the quantitative evaluation of motor function the most used tests are: Gross Motor Function Classification System, Manual Ability Classification System and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). As regards spasticity, Ashworth scale is more frequently used than Tardieu test. No trend currently exist for the upper limb evaluation, but it was noted that these tests are rarely used in clinical practice. We observed a significant use of gait analysis at diagnosis and follow-up of CP children. We conclude that there are large differences between clinicians for clinical examination of CP children. This lack of consensus makes patient data comparison difficult between clinical centers. This seems to indicate that a homogenization effort should be organized if one wishes to better stimulate collaborations between centers.