par Liberale, Gabriel 
;Lemaitre, Philippe ;Noterman, Danièle ;Moerman, Carine ;de Neubourg, E;Sirtaine, Nicolas;El Nakadi, Issam
Référence Acta chirurgica Belgica (Ed. bilingue), 110, 2, page (203-207)
Publication Publié, 2010
;Lemaitre, Philippe ;Noterman, Danièle ;Moerman, Carine ;de Neubourg, E;Sirtaine, Nicolas;El Nakadi, Issam Référence Acta chirurgica Belgica (Ed. bilingue), 110, 2, page (203-207)
Publication Publié, 2010
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Appendicular mucocele (AM) usually denotes a dilatation of the appendiceal lumen as a result of mucus accumulation that may be related to various neoplastic and non-neoplastic processes. Most of them are discovered incidentally. Treatment consists in complete resection avoiding rupture of the cyst in the peritoneal cavity. Indeed, rupture of such a cystic lesion in the peritoneal cavity can induce a catastrophic complication such as 'pseudomyxoma peritonei' (PMP). Therefore, some authors recommend an open surgical treatment. Currently, the debate concerning the best surgical technique to adopt for AM remains controversial. We report a case of AM found incidentally and treated by laparoscopy. The macroscopic aspect of the appendix suggested the diagnosis intra-operatively and every effort was made to avoid cystic rupture during appendicular resection. The histopathological diagnosis was mucinous cystadenoma. The patient is doing well at 2-year follow-up. The reported case and literature review show us that AM is not a contra-indication for laparoscopic surgery, but major concern resides in the early recognition of such a lesion at laparoscopy and in taking appropriate precautionary measures to avoid rupture in the peritoneal cavity. |
