Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture (39)
  1. 12. Chetail, F., & Boursain, E. (2019). Shared or separated representations for letters with diacritics? Psychonomic bulletin & review,(26), 347-352. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1503-0
  2. 13. Chetail, F., Porteous, F., Patout, P.-A., Content, A., & Collette, E. (2019). BOQS: Une échelle de qualité orthographique pour l’adulte / BOQS: Brussels Orthographic Quality Scale. Revue de neuropsychologie,(11), 214-226.
  3. 14. Chetail, F., Ranzini, M., De Tiege, X., Wens, V., & Content, A. (2018). The consonant/vowel pattern determines the structure of orthographic representations in the left fusiform gyrus. Cortex, 101, 73-86. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.006
  4. 15. Chetail, F., & Content, A. (2017). The perceptual structure of printed words: The case of silent E words in French. Journal of memory and language, 97, 121-134. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.007
  5. 16. Chetail, F. (2017). What do we do with what we learn? Statistical learning of orthographic regularities impacts written word processing. Cognition, 163, 103-120. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.015
  6. 17. Vidal, C., Content, A., & Chetail, F. (2017). BACS: Brussels Artificial Characters Sets for studies in cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 49, 2093-2112. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0844-8
  7. 18. Ginsburg, V., Archambeau, K., van Dijck, J. P., Chetail, F., & Gevers, W. (2017). Coding of serial order in verbal, visual and spatial working memory. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 146(5), 632-650. doi:10.1037/xge0000278
  8. 19. Chetail, F., Treiman, R., & Content, A. (2016). Effect of consonant/vowel letter organisation on the syllable counting task: Evidence from English. Journal of cognitive psychology, 28(1), 32-43. doi:10.1080/20445911.2015.1074582
  9. 20. Chetail, F. (2015). Reconsidering the role of orthographic redundancy in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 645.
  10. 21. Chetail, F., Treiman, R., Balota, D., & Content, A. (2015). What can megastudies tell us about the orthographic structure of English words? The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 69, 1519-1540. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.963628
  11. 22. Chetail, F. (2014). Effect of number of syllables in visual word recognition: New insights from the lexical decision task. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(10), 1249-1256. doi:10.1080/23273798.2013.876504
  12. 23. Chetail, F., & Content, A. (2014). What is the difference between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly five pixels. Orthographic structure biases the perceived length of letter strings. Psychological science, 25(1), 243-249.
    13. << Précédent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Suivant >>