par Stohl, A.;Prata, A.;Eckhardt, S;Clarisse, Lieven ;Durant, A.;Henne, S.;Kristiansen, NI;Minikin, A;Schumann, Ulrich;Seibert, P;Stebel, K;Thomas, Harry Ronald;Thorsteinsson, Thorsteinn;Torseth, Kjetil;Weinzierl, B
Référence Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 11, page (4333-4351)
Publication Publié, 2011
Référence Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 11, page (4333-4351)
Publication Publié, 2011
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : | The April-May, 2010 volcanic eruptions of Eyjafjallajokull, Iceland caused significant economic and social disruption in Europe whilst state of the art measurements and ash dispersion forecasts were heavily criticized by the aviation industry. Here we demonstrate for the first time that large improvements can be made in quantitative predictions of the fate of volcanic ash emissions, by using an inversion scheme that couples a priori source information and the output of a Lagrangian dispersion model with satellite data to estimate the volcanic ash source strength as a function of altitude and time. From the inversion, we obtain a total fine ash emission of the eruption of 8.3 +/- 4.2 Tg for particles in the size range of 2.8-28 mu m diameter. We evaluate the results of our model results with a posteriori ash emissions using independent ground-based, airborne and space-borne measurements both in case studies and statistically. Subsequently, we estimate the area over Europe affected by volcanic ash above certain concentration thresholds relevant for the aviation industry. We find that during three episodes in April and May, volcanic ash concentrations at some altitude in the atmosphere exceeded the limits for the "Normal" flying zone in up to 14% (6-16%), 2% (1-3%) and 7% (4-11%), respectively, of the European area. For a limit of 2 mg m(-3) only two episodes with fractions of 1.5% (0.2-2.8%) and 0.9% (0.1-1.6%) occurred, while the current "No-Fly" zone criterion of 4 mg m(-3) was rarely exceeded. Our results have important ramifications for determining air space closures and for real-time quantitative estimations of ash concentrations. Furthermore, the general nature of our method yields better constraints on the distribution and fate of volcanic ash in the Earth system. |