par Notebaert, Wim;Gevers, Wim 
;Verbruggen, Frederick;Liefooghe, Baptist
Référence Psychonomic bulletin & review, 13, 1, page (112-117)
Publication Publié, 2006
;Verbruggen, Frederick;Liefooghe, BaptistRéférence Psychonomic bulletin & review, 13, 1, page (112-117)
Publication Publié, 2006
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Several studies have demonstrated reduced congruency effects after incongruent trials. The conflict monitoring hypothesis (Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, and Cohen, 2001) assumes that this sequential modulation is based on top-down cognitive control and suggests that more control is engaged after the detection of conflict. An alternative account is based on repetition effects of stimulus and response features and can be considered bottom up. This study investigates both modulatory sources. In a Stroop task with two response-stimulus intervals (RSIs), we demonstrate that top-down modulation does not occur with a very short RSI, suggesting that it takes some time before the system can be reconfigured. Bottom-up modulation is observed for both RSIs. This finding demonstrates that two different sources simultaneously reduce congruency effects after incongruent trials. |
