• Citer

Nonlinear Dynamics of MEG and EMG: Stability and Similarity Analysis

par Hakkak Moghadam Torbati, Armin;Georgiev, Christian ;Digileva, Daria ;Yanguma Muñoz, Nicolás ;Cabaraux, Pierre ;Davoudi, Narges;Piitulainen, Harri;Jousmaki, Veikko ;Bourguignon, Mathieu
Référence Brain sciences, 15, 7, page (681)
Publication Publié, 2025-07

Article révisé par les pairs

• Accès en ligne
• Détails
• Contenu
• Statistiques

Résumé :

Background: Sensorimotor beta oscillations are critical for motor control and become synchronized with muscle activity during sustained contractions, forming corticomuscular coherence (CMC). Although beta activity manifests in transient bursts, suggesting nonlinear behavior, most studies rely on linear analyses, leaving the underlying dynamic structure of brain–muscle interactions underexplored. Objectives: To investigate the nonlinear dynamics underlying beta oscillations during isometric contraction. Methods: MEG and EMG were recorded from 17 right-handed healthy adults performing a 10 min isometric pinch task. Lyapunov exponent (LE), fractal dimension (FD), and correlation dimension (CD) were computed in 10 s windows to assess temporal stability. Signal similarity was assessed using Pearson correlation of amplitude envelopes and the nonlinear features. Burstiness was estimated using the coefficient of variation (CV) of the beta envelope to examine how transient fluctuations in signal amplitude relate to underlying nonlinear dynamics. Phase-randomized surrogate signals were used to validate the nonlinearity of the original data. Results: In contrast to FD, LE and CD revealed consistent, structured dynamics over time and significantly differed from surrogate signals, indicating sensitivity to non-random patterns. Both MEG and EMG signals demonstrated temporal stability in nonlinear features. However, MEG–EMG similarity was captured only by linear envelope correlation, not by nonlinear features. CD was strongly associated with beta burstiness in MEG, suggesting it reflects information similar to that captured by the amplitude envelope. In contrast, LE showed a weaker, inverse relationship, and FD was not significantly associated with burstiness. Conclusions: Nonlinear features capture intrinsic, stable dynamics in cortical and muscular beta activity, but do not reflect cross-modal similarity, highlighting a distinction from conventional linear analyses.