par Moungondo, Fabian ;Van Rompaey, Hannah;Moussa, Mohamad M.K.;Schuind, Frederic
Référence Journal of Ultrasound
Publication Publié, 2024
Référence Journal of Ultrasound
Publication Publié, 2024
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : | Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous release procedures under sonography using Sono-Instruments® in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and trigger finger (TF). Methods: Prospective study involving 30 patients, divided into two groups (15 CTS, and 15 TF). The primary outcomes were surgical performance-related outcomes (visibility, ease of use, satisfaction, duration) using Sono-Instruments® and patient-related outcomes (pain, activity limitations, time to return to work, functional scores). Secondary outcomes included complications. Patients were followed for two months post-operatively. Results: In the CTS group, the average age of the patients was 58.7 years. The percutaneous release of the transverse carpal ligament was effectively completed in all cases, with excellent device performance and no adverse events. At one week, all patients could wash their hands, 80% could perform activities of daily living, and 80% of those working had returned to their activities. At two months, all patients had resumed all activities. Pillar pain was still present in 53.3%. In the TF group, the patients had an average age of 57.9 years. The percutaneous release of the A1 annular pulley was successful in all cases, with excellent device performance and no adverse events. At one week, all patients could wash their hands, 93.3% could do all activities of daily living, and 75% of those working were back to their professional activities. At two months, all patients were back to all activities of daily living and work. The DASH score was significantly improved at two months, compared to preoperative, for both groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous sono-guided release using Sono-Instruments® is safe and efficient, and associated with quick functional recovery. Level of evidence: II. |