par Cheminel, Loïc;Lupu, Alexandru;Wallenhorst, Timothée;Lepilliez, Vincent;Leblanc, Sarah;Albouys, Jérémie;Abou Ali, Einas;Barret, Maximilien;Lorenzo, Diane;de Mestier, Louis;Burtin, Pascal;Girot, Paul;Le Baleur, Yann;Gerard, Romain;Yzet, Clara;Tchirikhtchian, Karl;Degand, Thibault;Culetto, Adrian;Lemmers, Arnaud
;Schaefer, Marion;Chevaux, Jean Baptiste;Zhong, Peng;Hervieu, Valérie;Subtil, Fabien;Rivory, Jérôme;Fine, Caroline;Jacques, Jérémie;Walter, Thomas;Pioche, Mathieu
Référence The American journal of gastroenterology, 119, 2, page (378-381)
Publication Publié, 2024-02-01

Référence The American journal of gastroenterology, 119, 2, page (378-381)
Publication Publié, 2024-02-01
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : | INTRODUCTION: When initial resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (r-NETs) is not R0, persistence of local residue could lead to disease recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the interest of systematic resection of non-R0 r-NET scars. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all the consecutive endoscopic revisions and resections of the scar after nonR0 resections of r-NETs. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included. Salvage endoscopic procedure using endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic full-thickness resection showed an R0 rate of near 100%. Residual r-NET was found in 43% of cases. DISCUSSION: In case of non-R0 resected r-NET, systematic scar resection by endoscopic full-thickness resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection seems necessary. |