par Mongold, Scott Jason 
;Georgiev, Christian ;Legrand, Thomas ;Bourguignon, Mathieu
Référence eNeuro, 11, 1, ENEURO.0384-23.2023
Publication Publié, 2024-01
;Georgiev, Christian ;Legrand, Thomas ;Bourguignon, Mathieu Référence eNeuro, 11, 1, ENEURO.0384-23.2023
Publication Publié, 2024-01
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Voluntary motor control is thought to be predicated on the ability to efficiently integrate and process somatosensory afferent information. However, current approaches in the field of motor control have not factored in objective markers of how the brain tracks incoming somatosensory information. Here, we asked whether motor performance relates to such markers obtained with an analysis of the coupling between peripheral kinematics and cortical oscillations during continuous movements, best known as corticokinematic coherence (CKC). Motor performance was evaluated by measuring both gross and fine motor skills using the Box and Blocks Test (BBT) and the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT), respectively, and with a biome-chanics measure of coordination. A total of 61 participants completed the BBT, while equipped with elec-troencephalography and electromyography, and the PPT. We evaluated CKC, from the signals collected during the BBT, as the coherence between movement rhythmicity and brain activity, and coordination as the cross-correlation between muscle activity. CKC at movements’ first harmonic was positively associated with BBT scores (r = 0.41, p = 0.001), and alone showed no relationship with PPT scores (r = 0.07, p = 0.60), but in synergy with BBT scores, participants with lower PPT scores had higher CKC than expected based on their BBT score. Coordination was not associated with motor performance or CKC (p > 0.05). These findings demonstrate that cortical somatosensory processing in the form of strengthened brain– peripheral coupling is specifically associated with better gross motor skills and thus may be considered as a valuable addition to classical tests of proprioception acuity. |
