par Agostinetto, Elisa;Jacobs, Flavia;Debien, Véronique ;De Caluwé, Alex ;Pop, Catalin-Florin ;Catteau, Xavier ;Aftimos, Philippe ;de Azambuja, Evandro ;Buisseret, Laurence
Référence Cancers, 14, 21, page (5467)
Publication Publié, 2022-11-01
Référence Cancers, 14, 21, page (5467)
Publication Publié, 2022-11-01
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : | Pre-surgical treatments in patients with early breast cancer allows a direct estimation of treatment efficacy, by comparing the tumor and the treatment. Patients who achieve a pathological complete response at surgery have a better prognosis, with lower risk of disease recurrence and death. Hence, clinical research efforts have been focusing on high-risk patients with residual disease at surgery, who may be “salvaged” through additional treatments administered in the post-neoadjuvant setting. In the present review, we aim to illustrate the development and advantages of the post-neoadjuvant setting, and to discuss the available strategies for patients with early breast cancer, either approved or under investigation. This review was written after literature search on main scientific databases (e.g., PubMed) and conference proceedings from major oncology conferences up to 1 August 2022. T-DM1 and capecitabine are currently approved as post-neoadjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, respectively, with residual disease at surgery. More recently, other treatment strategies have been approved for patients with high-risk early breast cancer, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the CDK 4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib. Novel agents and treatment combinations are currently under investigation as promising post-neoadjuvant treatment strategies. |