par Castellarin, Gianluca 
;Bori, Edoardo ;Rapallo, Laurence;Pianigiani, Silvia ;Innocenti, Bernardo
Référence Arthroplasty (London, England), 5, 1, page (3)
Publication Publié, 2023-01
;Bori, Edoardo ;Rapallo, Laurence;Pianigiani, Silvia ;Innocenti, Bernardo Référence Arthroplasty (London, England), 5, 1, page (3)
Publication Publié, 2023-01
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Numerous total knee prosthetic implants are currently available on the orthopedic market, and this variety covers a set of different levels of constraint: among the various models available, a significant role is covered by mobile bearing cruciate-retaining design with an ultra-congruent insert, mobile bearing cruciate-retaining design, fixed-bearing posterior stabilized prosthesis and fixed-bearing constrained condylar knee. A biomechanical comparative study among them could therefore be helpful for the clinical decision-making process. This study aimed to compare the effect of these different levels of constraint in the knee biomechanics of a patient, in three different configurations representing the typical boundary conditions experienced by the knee joint during daily activities. |
