par Paquier, Zelda ;Chao, Shih-Li ;Bregni, Giacomo ;Sanchez Corujo, Ana ;Guiot, Thomas ;Dhont, Jennifer;Gulyban, Akos;Levillain, Hugo ;Sclafani, Francesco ;Reynaert, Nick ;Bali, Maria Antonietta
Référence Physica medica, 103, page (138-146)
Publication Publié, 2022-11
Référence Physica medica, 103, page (138-146)
Publication Publié, 2022-11
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : | Purpose: The aim of this study was to perform a quantitative quality assurance of diffusion-weighted MRI to assess the variability of the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and other radiomic features across the scanners involved in the REGINA trial. Materials and methods: The NIST/QIBA diffusion phantom was acquired on six 3 T scanners from five centres with a rectum-specific diffusion protocol. All sequences were repeated in each scan session without moving the phantom from the table. Linear interpolation to two isotropic voxel spacing (0.9 and 4 mm) was performed as well as the ComBat feature harmonisation method between scanners. The absolute accuracy error was evaluated for the mean ADC. Repeatability and reproducibility within-subject coefficients of variation (wCV) were computed for 142 radiomic features. Results: For the mean ADC, accuracy error ranged between 0.1 % and 8.5 %, repeatability was <1 % and reproducibility was <3 % for diffusivity range between 0.4 and 1.1x10-3mm2/s. For the other radiomic features, wCV was below 10 % for 24 % and 15 % features for repeatability with resampling 0.9 mm and 4 mm, respectively, and 13 % and 11 % feature for reproducibility. ComBat method could improve significantly the wCV compared to reproducibility without ComBat (p-value < 0.001) but variation was still high for most of the features. Conclusion: Our study provided the first investigation of feature selection for development of robust predictive models in the REGINA trial, demonstrating the added value of such a quality assurance process to select conventional and radiomic features in prospective multicentre trials. |