par Nera, Kenzo 
;Bertin, Paul ;Klein, Olivier
Référence Current opinion in psychology, 47, 101381
Publication Publié, 2022-10-01
;Bertin, Paul ;Klein, Olivier Référence Current opinion in psychology, 47, 101381
Publication Publié, 2022-10-01
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | A significant trend of research construes conspiracy theories as a power challenging phenomenon. Yet, there is evidence that conspiracy theories are sometimes promoted by members of relatively powerful groups (e.g., a national majority) in order to target relatively powerless groups (e.g., immigrants). Thus, conspiracy theories are not necessarily beliefs held by the relatively powerless. However, they always attribute power to the allegedly conspiring parties. As a matter of fact, without such power, the groups accused of conspiring would be unable to carry out their plans. In contrast to assuming conspiracy theories reflect objective power imbalances, we propose that they may be construed as opportunistic attributions of power that allow individuals to advance their interests (e.g., validate their worldview, strengthen or challenge social hierarchies). |
