par Zijlstra, Josée J.M.;Follows, George;Casasnovas, René Olivier;Vermaat, Joost J.S.P.;Kalakonda, Nagesh;Choquet, Sylvain;Hill, Brian;Thieblemont, Catherine;Cavallo, Federica;De la Cruz, Fátima;Kuruvilla, John;Hamad, Nada;Jäger, Ulrich;Caimi, Paolo;Gurion, Ronit;Warzocha, Krzysztof;Bakhshi, Sameer;Sancho, Juan Manuel;Schuster, Michael;Egyed, Miklos;Offner, Fritz;Vassilakopoulos, Theodoros;Samal, Priyanka;Ku, Matthew;Xu, Jenny;Corona, Kelly;Chamoun, Kamal;Shah, Jatin;Canales, Miguel;Maerevoet, Marie 
Référence Cancers (Basel), 14, 3, 791
Publication Publié, 2022-02

Référence Cancers (Basel), 14, 3, 791
Publication Publié, 2022-02
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : | Selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export, was evaluated in the Phase 2b SADAL study in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who previously received two to five prior systemic regimens. In post hoc analyses, we analyzed several categories of patient characteristics (age, renal function, DLBCL subtype, absolute lymphocyte count, transplant status, number of prior lines of therapy, refractory status, Ann Arbor disease stage, and lactate dehydrogenase) at baseline, i.e., during screening procedures, to determine their potential contributions to the efficacy (overall response rate [ORR], duration of response [DOR], overall survival [OS]) and tolerability of selinexor. Across most categories of characteristics, no significant difference was observed in ORR or DOR. OS was significantly longer for patients < 65 vs. ≥65 years, and for those with lymphocyte counts ≥ 1000/µL vs. <1000/µL or lactate dehydrogenase ≤ ULN vs. >ULN. The most common adverse events (AEs) across the characteristics were thrombocytopenia and nausea, and similar rates of grade 3 AEs and serious AEs were observed. With its oral administration, novel mechanism of action, and consistency in responses in heavily pretreated patients, selinexor may help to address an important unmet clinical need in the treatment of DLBCL. |