par Fontana, Vito;Coureau, Michelle;Grigoriu, Bogdan;Tamburini, Nicola;Lemaitre, J.;Meert, Anne-Pascale 
Référence Revue des maladies respiratoires, 39, 1, page (40-54)
Publication Publié, 2022-01-01
Référence Revue des maladies respiratoires, 39, 1, page (40-54)
Publication Publié, 2022-01-01
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Lung (bronchial) cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Western countries today. Thoracic surgery represents a major therapeutic strategy and the various advances made in recent years have made it possible to develop less and less invasive techniques. That said, the postoperative period may be lengthy, post-surgical approaches need to be more precisely codified, and it matters that the different interventions involved be supported by sound scientific evidence. To date, however, there exists no evidence that preventive postoperative admission to intensive care is beneficial for patients having undergone lung resection surgery without immediate complications. A stratification of the risk of complications taking into consideration the patient's general state of health (e.g., nutritional status, degree of autonomy, etc.), comorbidities and type of surgery could be a useful predictive tool regarding the need for postoperative intensive care. However, serious post-operative complications remain relatively frequent and post-operative management of these intensive care patients is liable to become complex and long-lasting. In the aftermath of the validation of “enhanced recovery after surgery” (ERAS) in thoracic surgery, new protocols are needed to optimize management of patients having undergone pulmonary resection. This article focuses on the main postoperative complications and more broadly on intensive care patient management following thoracic surgery. |
