Résumé : Objective: Cancer-related communication is critical for patients’ and caregivers’ adaptation to illness. This randomized pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a specific dyadic intervention to improve communication. Methods: A four weekly-session intervention was developed to reinforce cancer-related patient-caregiver communication. Patients receiving treatment for any diagnosed cancer, and their caregivers, were recruited from two oncology clinics in Belgium. Sixty-four patient-caregiver dyads were assigned randomly to intervention and waitlist groups. Cancer-related dyadic communication, dyadic coping and emotional distress were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Results: The intervention attrition rate was 6 %. Linear mixed models were performed on 60 dyads. Significant two-way group × time interaction indicated improvement in participants’ cancer-related dyadic communication frequency (β = −1.30; SE = .31; p = .004), self-efficacy (β = −10.03; SE = 3.90; p = .011) and dyadic coping (β = −5.93; SE = 2.73; p = .046) after the intervention. Conclusion: These results indicate that the brief dyadic communication intervention is feasible and acceptable, and show preliminary evidence of efficacy. Practice implications: Encouraging patients and caregivers to discuss personal cancer-related concerns may improve their ability to cope with the illness together.