• Citer

Aprotinin versus tranexamic acid in children undergoing cardiac surgery: An observational study

par Willems, Ariane ;De Groote, Françoise ;Dumoulin, Melanie ;Fils, Jean François;Van Der Linden, Philippe
Référence European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 56, 4, page (688-695)
Publication Publié, 2019-10

Article révisé par les pairs

• Accès en ligne
• Détails
• Contenu
• Statistiques

Résumé :

OBJECTIVES: The upcoming release of aprotinin in paediatric cardiac surgery prompted a re-evaluation of its use in comparison to tranexamic acid (TXA) focusing on their effect on exposure to blood transfusions as well as severe postoperative morbidity or mortality. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary children hospital from 2002 to 2015. Patients receiving aprotinin (Aprotinin group: 2002-2007) were compared with those receiving TXA group (2008-2015) using propensity score analysis. Primary outcome measures were 'exposure to blood products' and 'severe postoperative morbidity or mortality'. High-risk subgroups that included neonates, complex (Risk Adjusted Classification for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 ≥ 3) and redo surgery were also analysed. RESULTS: The study included 2157 patients, 1136 in the Aprotinin group and 1021 in the TXA group. Exposure to blood products was significantly higher in the Aprotinin group (78% vs 60%; P < 0.001) as well as in the complex and redo surgery subgroups. Incidence of mortality and/or severe morbidity was higher in the Aprotinin group (33% vs 28%; P = 0.007), as well as in the neonate group. However, cardiopulmonary bypass priming volume and intraoperative fluid balance were significantly decreased, and the use of modified ultrafiltration significantly increased in the TXA group. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, children receiving aprotinin were more frequently transfused and were at a higher risk of developing severe postoperative morbidity or mortality than those receiving TXA. Subgroups at high risk of bleeding or inflammation did not seem to benefit from aprotinin. These differences might be explained by a safer profile of TXA, but also attributed to major changes in our patient blood management strategies over years.