par Sirunyan, A.M.;Brun, Hugues 
;Clerbaux, Barbara ;De Lentdecker, Gilles ;Delannoy, Hugo ;Fasanella, Giuseppe ;Favart, Laurent ;Goldouzian, Reza ;Grebenyuk, Anastasia ;Karapostoli, Georgia ;Lenzi, Thomas ;Leonard, Alexandre ;Luetic, Jelena ;Maerschalk, Thierry ;Marinov, Audrey ;Randle-Conde, Aidan Sean ;Vander Velde, Catherine ;Seva, Tomislav ;Vanlaer, Pascal ;Vannerom, David ;Yonamine, Ryo ;Zenoni, Florian ;Zhang, Fengwangdong ;Fang, Wenxing ; [et al.]
Référence The Journal of high energy physics, 2017, 9, 106
Publication Publié, 2017
;Clerbaux, Barbara ;De Lentdecker, Gilles ;Delannoy, Hugo ;Fasanella, Giuseppe ;Favart, Laurent ;Goldouzian, Reza ;Grebenyuk, Anastasia ;Karapostoli, Georgia ;Lenzi, Thomas ;Leonard, Alexandre ;Luetic, Jelena ;Maerschalk, Thierry ;Marinov, Audrey ;Randle-Conde, Aidan Sean ;Vander Velde, Catherine ;Seva, Tomislav ;Vanlaer, Pascal ;Vannerom, David ;Yonamine, Ryo ;Zenoni, Florian ;Zhang, Fengwangdong ;Fang, Wenxing ; [et al.]Référence The Journal of high energy physics, 2017, 9, 106
Publication Publié, 2017
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | The 95% CL lower limits on the effective unparticle cut off scaleΛU for a fixed coupling λ = 1. The results from the CMS monojet [1] and mono-Z [2] searches, as well as a reinterpretation of LEP and CDF searches [3] are shown for comparison. The LEP results assume a coupling of unparticles to Z bosons and photons. The CDF (CMS) monojet result is based on a gluonunparticle coupling operator (gluon- and quark-unparticle coupling operators). The inset compares the expected and observed limits for the CMS mono-Z analyses at p √s = 8 and 13TeV. Note that the cutoff scalesΛU for different operators do not have to be identical. Consequently, the comparison shown here with the results other than the CMS 8TeV mono-Z analysis is only qualitative. In the original paper, figure 10 was incorrect. The correct figure is shown above. |
