Résumé : Abstract. Insects apparently responding to the visual stimulus offered by a tree or other object may also be responding to the variety of physical effects caused by the obstruction, including turbulence, a reduction in wind velocity and eddies. The relative importance of prey odour associated with the bark beetle Dendroctonus micans (Kugelann) (Scolytidae), prey‐host‐tree odour, silhouette, and physical barrier to the wind, in the orientation and landing behaviour of a predatory beetle, Rhizophagus grandis Gyllenhall (Rhizophagidae), were investigated. R. grandis responded very positively to the frass of its prey when presented on a ‘tree’ but not to the same quantity of frass presented alone. Frass on black plastic uPVC pipes was significantly more attractive than frass on real host tree logs, suggesting that host‐tree volatiles do not enhance the attractiveness of prey frass. The beetles responded to ‘transparent’ Mylar three‐dimensional cylinders in the same way as they did to the black plastic pipes. Beetles were also tested with frass and two‐dimensional stimuli offering a visual stimulus or physical barrier alone or in combination. Frass with a two‐dimensional visual stimulus was no better than frass alone: few insects landed. Significantly more insects were attracted to the same two‐dimensional visual stimulus with a hidden upwind barrier producing turbulence, but a similar number were attracted to the frass in front of a hidden barrier alone. As many plants are similar in size to the logs used in these experiments, comparable effects might influence the behaviour of other phytophagous insects, their predators and parasitoids. Copyright © 1993, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved