par Atash, Ramin
;Fneiche, Ali
;Cetik, Sibel
;Bahrami, Babak
;Balon-Perin, Alain
;Valvekens, Maria Orellana
;Glineur, Régine 
Référence European Journal of Dentistry, 11, 2, page (180-185)
Publication Publié, 2017







Référence European Journal of Dentistry, 11, 2, page (180-185)
Publication Publié, 2017
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : | Objective: Adhesives systems have a drawback when utilized for bonding orthodontic brackets: they shrink during photopolymerization creating microleakage. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of different orthodontic adhesives around brackets and enamel. Materials and Methods: Sixty noncarious mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were randomly divided into six groups of adhesives used for bonding brackets to dental enamel: NeoBond® Light Cure Adhesive Kit, Transbond™ Plus Self-Etching, Victory V-Slot APC PLUS® + Transbond™ MIP, Rely-A-Bond® Kit, Light Cure Orthodontic Adhesive Kit (OptiBond®), and Transbond™ MIP. Following bonding, all teeth underwent 2500 cycles of thermal cycling in baths ranging from 5°C to 55°C before being immersed in 2% methylene blue for 24 h. All samples were examined under a binocular microscope to assess the degree of microleakage at the "bracket-adhesive" and "adhesive-enamel" interfaces in the gingival and occlusal regions of the bracket. Results: A significant difference was found at the "occlusal bracket-adhesive" interface. The highest microleakage values were found in the occlusal region, although no significant. Microleakage was observed in all groups. Conclusion: Group 2 had the highest microleakage values whereas Group 6 had the lowest values. |