par Le Roux, Peter;Armonda, Rocco;Badjatia, Neeraj;Bösel, Julian;Chesnut, Randall;Chou, Sherry;Claassen, Jan;Czosnyka, Marek;De Georgia, Michael;Figaji, Anthony;Fugate, Jennifer;Menon, David Krishna;Helbok, Raimund;Horowitz, David;Hutchinson, Peter;Kumar, Monisha;McNett, Molly;Miller, Chad;Naidech, Andrew;Oddo, Mauro;Olson, DaiWai;O'Phelan, Kristine;Citerio, Giuseppe;Provencio, Javier Javier;Puppo, Corinna;Riker, Richard;Roberson, Claudia;Schmidt, Michael;Taccone, Fabio ;Vespa, Paul;Bader, Mary Kay;Brophy, Gretchen G.M.;Diringer, Michael M.N.;Stocchetti, Nino;Videtta, Walter
Référence Neurocritical care, 21, 2, page (297-361)
Publication Publié, 2014-10
Référence Neurocritical care, 21, 2, page (297-361)
Publication Publié, 2014-10
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : | A variety of technologies have been developed to assist decision-making during the management of patients with acute brain injury who require intensive care. A large body of research has been generated describing these various technologies. The Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) in collaboration with the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Latin America Brain Injury Consortium (LABIC) organized an international, multidisciplinary consensus conference to perform a systematic review of the published literature to help develop evidence-based practice recommendations on bedside physiologic monitoring. This supplement contains a Consensus Summary Statement with recommendations and individual topic reviews on physiologic processes important in the care of acute brain injury. In this article we provide the evidentiary tables for select topics including systemic hemodynamics, intracranial pressure, brain and systemic oxygenation, EEG, brain metabolism, biomarkers, processes of care and monitoring in emerging economies to provide the clinician ready access to evidence that supports recommendations about neuromonitoring. |