par Naeije, Robert
Référence Applied Physiology in Intensive Care Medicine, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Ed. 1, page (45-48)
Publication Publié, 2006
Partie d'ouvrage collectif
Résumé : Almost 20 years ago, Adriaan Versprille published an editorial in this journal to explain why, in his opinion, the calculation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is meaningless [1]. The uncertainties of PVR were underscored a year later by McGregor and Sniderman in the American Journal of Cardiology [2]. Obviously, both papers failed to convince. A Medline search from 1985 to the end of 2002 reveals no less than 7,158 papers with PVR calculations. What is it that could be wrong in all this literature? © 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.