• Citer

Overall survival benefit for sequential doxorubicin-docetaxel compared with concurrent doxorubicin and docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer-8-year results of the breast international group 02-98 phase III trial

par Oakman, Catherine;Di Leo, Angelo ;Francis, Prudence;Crown, John;Quinaux, Emmanuel;Buyse, Marc;de Azambuja, Evandro ;Punzalan, L.;Piccart-Gebhart, Martine ;Vila, Mireia Margeli;Andersson, Michael;Nordenskjöld, B;Jakesz, Raimund;Thürlimann, Beat;Gutiérrez, Jorge Martos J.;Harvey, Vernon;Dell'Orto, Patrizia;Viale, Giuseppe;Larsimont, Denis ;Steinberg, I.;Gelber, Richard
Référence Annals of oncology, 24, 5, page (1203-1211), mds627
Publication Publié, 2013-05

Article révisé par les pairs

• Accès en ligne
• Détails
• Contenu
• Statistiques

Résumé :

Background: In women with node-positive breast cancer, the Breast International Group (BIG) 02-98 tested the incorporation of docetaxel (Taxotere) into doxorubicin (Adriamycin)-based chemotherapy, and compared sequential and concurrent docetaxel. At 5 years, there was a trend for improved disease-free survival (DFS) with docetaxel. We present results at 8-year median follow-up and exploratory analyses within biologically defined subtypes. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatments: (i) sequential control: doxorubicin (A) (75 mg/m. 2) × 4 → classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF); (ii) concurrent control: doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (AC)(60/600 mg/m. 2) × 4 →CMF; (iii) sequential docetaxel: A (75 mg/m. 2) × 3 → docetaxel (T) (100 mg/m. 2) × 3 → CMF and (iv) concurrent docetaxel: AT(50/75 mg/m. 2) × 4 →CMF. The primary comparison evaluated docetaxel efficacy regardless of the schedule. Exploratory analyses were undertaken within biologically defined subtypes. Results: Two thousand eight hundred and eighty-seven patients were enrolled. After 93.4 months of median follow-up, there were 916 DFS events. For the primary comparison, there was no significant improvement in DFS from docetaxel [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-1.05, P = 0.187]. In secondary comparisons, sequential docetaxel significantly improved DFS compared with sequential control (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.99, P = 0.036), and significantly improved DFS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.99, P = 0.035) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65-0.98, P = 0.028) compared with concurrent doxorubicin-docetaxel. Luminal-A disease had the best prognosis. HRs favored addition of sequential docetaxel in all subtypes, except luminal-A; but this observation was not statistically supported because of limited numbers. Conclusion: With further follow-up, the sequential docetaxel schedule resulted in significantly better OS than concurrent doxorubicin-docetaxel, and continued to show better DFS than sequential doxorubicin-based control. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.