• Citer

Identity elements required for enzymatic formation of N2,N2-dimethylguanosine from N2-monomethylated derivative and its possible role in avoiding alternative conformations in archaeal tRNA.

par Urbonavicius, Jaunius ;Armengaud, Jean;Grosjean, Henri
Référence Journal of Molecular Biology, 357, 2, page (387-399)
Publication Publié, 2006-03

Article révisé par les pairs

• Accès en ligne
• Détails
• Contenu
• Statistiques

Résumé :

Here, we have investigated the specificity of purified recombinant tRNA:m(2)(2)G10 methyltransferase of Pyrococcus abyssi ((Pab)Trm-m(2)(2)G10 enzyme). This archaeal enzyme catalyses mono- and dimethylation of the N(2)-exocyclic amino group of guanine at position 10 of several tRNA species. Our results indicate that only few identity elements are required for the efficient formation of m(2)(2)G10. They are composed of a G10.U25 wobble base-pair in the dihydrouridine arm (D-arm) and a four nucleotide variable loop (V-loop) within a canonical three-dimensional (3D) structure. The types of base-pairs in the D-arm or amino acid acceptor stem are also important for the enzymatic reaction, but appear to affect only the rate of tRNA methylation. However, in tRNA species harbouring a G10-C25 Watson-Crick base-pair and/or five nucleotide V-loop, only m(2)G10 is produced. To impair the monomethylation reaction, drastic amputation in the T-arm is required. Our observations contrast with those reported earlier for the identity elements required for a remotely related Pyrococcus furiosus Trm-m(2)(2)G26 enzyme (alias (Pfu)Trm1) that also catalyses the two step formation of m(2)(2)G but at position 26 in several tRNA species. In this case, a G10-C25 base-pair together with the five nucleotide V-loop were shown to be required for efficient formation of m(2)(2)G26. Thus, in the Pyrococcus genus, the major identity elements that preclude formation of m(2)(2)G at positions 10 or 26 in tRNA are mutually exclusive. Therefore, the Trm-m(2)(2)G10 and Trm-m(2)(2)G26 enzymes have evolved independently towards different specificities. In addition, identity elements for m(2)/m(2)(2)G10 formation in archaeal tRNA are different from the ones required for m(2)G10 formation in eukaryal tRNA. We propose that archaeal tRNA:m(2)(2)G10 methyltransferases, unlike the orthologous eukaryal tRNA:m(2)G10 methyltransferases, evolved towards m(2)(2)G10 specificity due to the possible requirement of preventing formation of alternative structures in G/C rich archaeal tRNA species.