par Hublet, Chloé
Référence European law journal, 15, 6, page (757-774)
Publication Publié, 2009-11
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : This article will critically examine the traditional interpretation of Article 12 EC-prohibiting discrimination on the basis of nationality-as not applying to third country nationals (TCNs). Different arguments, both for and against this 'classic' interpretation, will be considered. Analysing the question of the 'scope of application of the EC Treaty', with a view to determining the scope of application of Article 12 EC, it will be emphasised that this is not restricted to the right of free movement, in that the latter's restricted personal scope of application does not determine that of Article 12 EC. This is all the more true following the Treaty of Amsterdam's partial 'Communitarisation' of policies on visas, asylum and immigration, which tend to apply principally to TCNs. In extending the material scope of application of the EC Treaty, this 'Communitarisation' simultaneously leads to an extension of the specific scope of application of Article 12 EC. Working from the hypothesis that Article 12 EC could indeed apply to TCNs, we will then examine the eventual consequences of such an application. © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.