par Camus, Anaïs 
;Storme, Tristan
Référence The Review of politics, 74, 4, page (659-684)
Publication Publié, 2012-10-10
;Storme, Tristan Référence The Review of politics, 74, 4, page (659-684)
Publication Publié, 2012-10-10
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Tocqueville can easily be seen as the symbol of the French liberal thought whereas Schmitt is considered as the brightest opponent of the liberal doctrine. Trying to reconcile their theories might thus seem counterintuitive. However, delving into Schmitt's work reveals that the German thinker admired his French counterpart. As the question of their potential intellectual proximity becomes relevant, this article offers a first glance into what appears as a somehow connected interpretation of the democratic phenomenon in relation to their fear of possible depoliticizations. While they elaborate on distinct and almost contradictory questions which develop along diverging architectonics, the historian and the jurist show a deep problématique convergence. Furthermore, their reservations concerning the enlargement of national borders, individualism, and popular sovereignty reinforce this intuition with one notable exception: Schmitt keeps on ousting the variable liberty? from Tocqueville's democratic equation. © 2012 University of Notre Dame. |
