par Bazan, Ariane 
Editeur scientifique Bazan, Ariane
Référence Conversations with Howard Shevrin, His work, his research, his ideas, Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, University of Ghent, Ghent, Vol. 28, page (271-308)
Publication Publié, 2010
Editeur scientifique Bazan, Ariane
Référence Conversations with Howard Shevrin, His work, his research, his ideas, Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, University of Ghent, Ghent, Vol. 28, page (271-308)
Publication Publié, 2010
Partie d'ouvrage collectif
| Résumé : | Howard Shevrin's interest in neuroscience was first methodological: it provided independent evidence on what goes on unconsciously. The foundation of the mind needs not to be entirely neurophysiological: it is possible to describe the mechanisms in psychological terms. However, we aren't anywhere near a unified theory of the brain and mind. When one goes into analysis, the theory is no longer simply about ideas, one's life almost hangs in the balance. There is an enormous disparity between the neuroscientist publishing his findings and the analyst who is treating patients, but not publishing. If neuro-psychoanalysis is only going to rely on the neuroscience part, it's really not going to achieve its important objective. People into psychoanalysis should be trained in "the basic science of psychoanalysis", which should not be limited to neuroscience, but should include a really important training in psychology, sociology, etc. |
