par Bonnechere, Bruno 
;Beyer, Benoît ;Rooze, Marcel ;Van Sint Jan, Serge
Référence Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 13, page (423-429)
Publication Publié, 2014-05
;Beyer, Benoît ;Rooze, Marcel ;Van Sint Jan, Serge Référence Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 13, page (423-429)
Publication Publié, 2014-05
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | The main objective of this study was to perform a biomechanical analysis of three different sprint start patterns to determine the safest position in term of neck injury and Sport-Related Concussion (SRC). The second objective was to collect data on the learning process effect between football players and nonplayers. Three different sprint initial positions adopted by football players were studied (i.e., 4-, 3- and 2-point positions). Twenty five young healthy males, including 12 football players, participated to this study. A stereophotogrammetric system (i.e., Vicon) was used to record motion patterns and body segments positions. Various measurements related to head and trunk orientation, and player field-of-view were obtained (e.g., head height, trunk bending, time to reach upright position, head speed (vertical direction) and body speed (horizontal direction)). Learning process was found to have no influence on studied parameters. Head redress is also delayed when adopting a 4- point position leading to a reduce field-of-view during the start and increasing therefore the probability of collision. Concerning the three different positions, the 4-point position seems to be the more dangerous because leading to higher kinetic energy than the 2- and 3-point start positions. This study proposes a first biomechanical approach to understand risk/benefit balance for athletes for those three different start positions. Results suggested that the 4-point position is the most risky for football players. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. |
