par Van Mierlo, Joeri;Favrel, Vincent ;Meyer, Sandrine ;Hecq, Walter ; [et al.]
Référence International Journal of Automotive Technology, 4, 2, page (11)
Publication Publié, 2004
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : How to compare the environmental damage caused by vehicles with different fuels and drive trains? This paper describes a methodology to assess the environmental impact of vehicles, using different approaches, and evaluating their benefits and limitations. Rating systems are analysed as tools to compare the environmental impact of vehicles, allowing decision makers to dedicate their financial and non-financial policies and support measures in function of the ecological damage. The paper is based on the "Clean Vehicles" research project, commissioned by the Brussels Capital Region via the BlM-IBGE (Brussels Institute for the Conservation of the Environment) (Van Mierlo et al., 2001). The Vrije Universiteit Brussel (ETEC) and the Université Libre de Bruxelles (CEESE) have jointly carried out the workprogramme. The most important results of this project are illustrated in this paper. First an overview of environmental, economical and technical characteristics of the different alternative fuels and drive trains is given. Afterward the basic principles to identify the environmental impact of cars are described. An outline of the considered emissions and their environmental impact leads to the definition of the calculation method, named Ecoscore. A rather simple and pragmatic approach would be stating that all alternative fuelled vehicles (LPG, CNG. EV, HEV. etc.) can be considered as 'clean'. Another basic approach is considering as 'clean' all vehicles satisfying a stringent emission regulation like EURO IV or EEV. Such approaches however don't tell anything about the real environmental damage of the vehicles. In the paper we describe "how should the environmental impact of vehicles be defined?", including parameters affecting the emissions of vehicles and their influence on human beings and on the environment and "how could it be defined ?", taking into account the availability of accurate and reliable data. We take into account different damages (acid rain, photochemical air pollution, global warming, noise, etc.) and their impacts on several receptors like human beings (e.g.: cancer, respiratory diseases, etc), ecosystems, or buildings. The presented methodology is based on a kind of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in which the contribution of all emissions to a certain damage are considered (e.g. using Exposure-Response damage function). The emissions will include oil extraction, transportation refinery, electricity production, distribution, (Well-to-Wheel approach), as well as the emission due to the production, use and dismantling of the vehicle (Cradle-to-Grave approach). The different damages will be normalized to be able to make a comparison. Hence a reference value (determined by the reference vehicle chosen) will be defined as a target value (the normalized value will thus measure a kind of Distance to Target). The contribution of the different normalized damages to a single value "EcoScore" will be based on a panel weighting method. Some examples of the calculation of the Ecoscore for different alternative fuels and drive trains will be calculated as an illustration of the methodology. Copyright © 2003 KSAE.