Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture (7)
  1. 1. Ruytenbeek, N. (2019). Indirect requests, relevance, and politeness. Journal of pragmatics, 142, 78-89. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.007
  2. 2. Ruytenbeek, N. (2019). Current issues in the ontology and form of directive speech acts. International Review of Pragmatics. doi:10.1163/18773109-01102101
  3. 3. Deliens, G., Papastamou, F., Ruytenbeek, N., Geelhand, P., & Kissine, M. (2018). Selective Pragmatic Impairment in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Indirect Requests Versus Irony. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 48(9), 2938-2952. doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3561-6
  4. 4. Ruytenbeek, N., Verheyen, S., & Spector, B. (2017). Asymmetric inference towards the antonym: Experiments into the polarity and morphology of negated adjectives. Glossa, 2(1), 92, 1-27.
  5. 5. Ruytenbeek, N., Ostashchenko, E., & Kissine, M. (2017). Indirect request processing, sentence types and illocutionary forces. Journal of pragmatics, 119, 46-62. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.011
  6. 6. Rossi, D., & Ruytenbeek, N. (2014). Introduction. Belgian journal of linguistics, 28, 1-2. doi:10.1075/bjl.28.00int
  7. 7. Ruytenbeek, N. (2012). Les actes de langage indirects sont-ils tous conventionnels? Revue romane, 47(2), 258-282.
    8.   Thèses et mémoires (1)
  8. 1. Ruytenbeek, N. (2017). The Mechanics of Indirectness: A Case Study of Directive Speech Acts (Thèse doctorale non-publiée). Université libre de Bruxelles, Faculté de Lettres, Traduction et Communication - Langues, lettres et traductologie, Bruxelles.