par Laloyaux, Cédric 
;Devue, Christel;Doyen, Stéphane ;David, Elodie ;Cleeremans, Axel
Référence Consciousness and cognition, 17, 3, page (646-656)
Publication Publié, 2008-09
;Devue, Christel;Doyen, Stéphane ;David, Elodie ;Cleeremans, Axel Référence Consciousness and cognition, 17, 3, page (646-656)
Publication Publié, 2008-09
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Change blindness-our inability to detect changes in a stimulus-occurs even when the change takes place gradually, without any disruption [Simons, D. J., Franconeri, S. L., & Reimer, R. L. (2000). Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption. Perception, 29(10), 1143-1154]. Such gradual changes are more difficult to detect than changes that involve a disruption. Using this method, David et al. [David, E., Laloyaux, C., Devue, C., & Cleeremans, A. (in press). Change blindness to gradual changes in facial expressions. Psychologica Belgica] recently showed substantial blindness to changes that involve facial expressions of emotion. In this experiment, we show that people who failed to detect any change in the displays were (1) nevertheless influenced by the changing information in subsequent recognition decisions about which facial expression they had seen, and (2) that their confidence in their decisions was lower after exposure to changing vs. static displays. The findings therefore support the notion that undetected changes that occur in highly salient stimuli may be causally efficacious and influence subsequent behavior. Implications concerning the nature of the representations associated with undetected changes are discussed. |
