par Gevenois, Pierre-Alain 
;De Vuyst, Paul ;Dedeire, S.;Cosaert, J.;Vande Weyer, R.;Struyven, Julien
Référence Acta Radiologica, 35, page (226-229)
Publication Publié, 1994
;De Vuyst, Paul ;Dedeire, S.;Cosaert, J.;Vande Weyer, R.;Struyven, Julien Référence Acta Radiologica, 35, page (226-229)
Publication Publié, 1994
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | To compare the value of conventional CT (CCT) and high-resolution CT (HRCT) to detect benign asbestos-related diseases, 159 exposed workers with a normal chest radiography were imaged by both techniques. Pleural plaques were detected in a total of 59 cases (37.1%). Ten cases (16.9%) were detected by CCT only and one case (1.7%) by HRCT only. Pulmonary lesions compatible with parenchymal asbestosis were detected by HRCT in 20 cases, whereas CCT showed abnormalities in 45% of these. Rounded atelectasis was equally recognized by both techniques. The results confirm that in a subject with a normal chest radiography, HRCT is a better diagnostic tool to demonstrate lesions of asbestosis. On the other hand, HRCT is insufficient to exclude the presence of pleural plaques. When HRCT does not reveal pleural abnormalities, CCT should be performed. |
