par Kampelmann, Stephan 
;Van Hollebeke, Sarah V.S.;Vandergert, Paula
Référence Ecological economics, 129, C, page (82-93)
Publication Publié, 2016-10-01
;Van Hollebeke, Sarah V.S.;Vandergert, PaulaRéférence Ecological economics, 129, C, page (82-93)
Publication Publié, 2016-10-01
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | The literature on the governance of social-ecological systems increasingly recognizes a key role of bridging organisations (BOs) in transition processes towards sustainability. BOs can be defined as facilitators who allow for interorganisational collaboration. Our paper provides a more nuanced understanding of specific BO activities and their contributions towards urban sustainability. Our analysis is based on applying three complementary methodological angles (drawing on geolocalised data, interviews and action research) to 20years of urban renovation investments in the city-region of Brussels. We distinguish between multi-scale, multi-actor and multi-dimensional tensions in urban renovation programmes and link these tensions to bridging challenges for BOs. Results suggest that the corresponding three types of bridging roles form a trilemma rather than a trilogy: the BOs in study have mediated one tension by de facto exacerbating another. Lessons from action research suggest that a wider use of temporality and shared language to communicate about urban renovation projects could attenuate the bridging trilemma. |
