par Manfredi, Claudia;Lebacq, Jean;Cantarella, Giovanna;Schoentgen, Jean 
;Orlandi, Silvia;Bandini, Andrea;Dejonckere, P.H.
Référence Journal of voice, 31, 1, page (111.e1-111.e7)
Publication Publié, 2017
;Orlandi, Silvia;Bandini, Andrea;Dejonckere, P.H.Référence Journal of voice, 31, 1, page (111.e1-111.e7)
Publication Publié, 2017
Article révisé par les pairs
| Résumé : | Smartphone technology provides new opportunities for recording standardized voice samples of patients and sending the files by e-mail to the voice laboratory. This drastically improves the collection of baseline data, as used in research on efficiency of voice treatments. However, the basic requirement is the suitability of smartphones for recording and digitizing pathologic voices (mainly characterized by period perturbations and noise) without significant distortion. In this experiment, two smartphones (a very inexpensive one and a high-level one) were tested and compared with direct microphone recordings in a soundproof room. The voice stimuli consisted in synthesized deviant voice samples (median of fundamental frequency: 120 and 200 Hz) with three levels of jitter and three levels of added noise. All voice samples were analyzed using PRAAT software. The results show high correlations between jitter, shimmer, and noise-to-harmonics ratio measured on the recordings via both smartphones, the microphone, and measured directly on the sound files from the synthesizer. Smartphones thus appear adequate for reliable recording and digitizing of pathologic voices. |
