par Boeri, Tito 
;Scarpa, Carlo;Tsyganok, Lidia ;Wey, Christian;Castanheira De Moura, Micael ;Faini, Riccardo;Galasso, Vincenzo;Navaretti, Giorgio Barba;Carcillo, Stéphane;Haskel, Jonathan;Nicoletti, Giuseppe;Perotti, Enrico
Référence Structural Reforms Without Prejudices, Oxford University Press
Publication Publié, 2007-05
;Scarpa, Carlo;Tsyganok, Lidia ;Wey, Christian;Castanheira De Moura, Micael ;Faini, Riccardo;Galasso, Vincenzo;Navaretti, Giorgio Barba;Carcillo, Stéphane;Haskel, Jonathan;Nicoletti, Giuseppe;Perotti, EnricoRéférence Structural Reforms Without Prejudices, Oxford University Press
Publication Publié, 2007-05
Partie d'ouvrage collectif
| Résumé : | This chapter discusses an alternate strategy that policy-makers tend to use when they do not enjoy sufficiently strong political power, and when they address reforms in broad-reaching sectors that affect a large fraction of the population. In the absence of a large parliamentary majority or in the presence of strong opposition in the economic or social arena, policy-makers widen the political base for their reform by resorting to social dialogue and to a more consensual style. The need to gather wider social and political support induces policy-makers to increase the share of winners from the reform, while raising expenses for the losers. |
