par Jakobovits, Hadassa ;Vermeir, Dirk
Référence Journal of logic and computation, 9, 2, page (215-261)
Publication Publié, 1999-04
Article révisé par les pairs
Résumé : We suggest a so-called `robust' semantics for a model of argumentation which represents arguments and their interactions, called `argumentation frameworks'. We study a variety of additional definitions of acceptability of arguments; we explore the properties of these definitions; we describe their interrelationships: e.g. robust models can be characterized using the minimal (well-founded) models of a meta-framework. The various definitions of acceptability of argument sets can all deal with contradiction within an argumentation framework.