Résumé : Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is an electrophoretic separation technique that was rapidly increasing in popularity some years ago and that led to high expectations. Because of their different separation mechanisms, CE and HPLC are alternative and complementary separation techniques. Chiral molecules can be directly separated with CE by simply adding a chiral selector to the running buffer solution, leading to flexible and cheap methods. Major drawbacks of capillary electrophoretic separation methods are, however, the lower precision compared to HLPC methods and a more problematic analytical method transfer. Both above stated disadvantages limit the generalized use of CE methods in the pharmaceutical industry. Multiple solutions have been suggested to improve the precision of CE methods. In this work the application of a constant current during the electrophoretic separation instead of the more commonly used application of a constant voltage was studied on two CE instruments with different cooling mechanisms. This was done in the context of optimizing method transfer conditions. A constant current may reduce the generation of heat in the capillary and the consequentially radial and axial temperature fluctuations that both negatively influence the precision of the peak areas, migration times and resolutions of a CE method. The repeatability and time-different intermediate precision of both electrophoretic separation modes were compared on two different CE instruments after a successful analytical method transfer. The chiral separations of three beta-blockers, propranolol, sotalol and betaxolol, were used as test cases. A constant current led to a general improvement of the repeatability and time-different intermediate precision of the relative Area Under the Curve of all three beta-blockers, while that of the migration times remained rather constant. It also led to more similar electropherograms than the application of a constant voltage. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.